DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009005861-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-09

000129361

Contested design: 009005861-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 009005861-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

CD Commerce GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Bebra, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Xiaoxia LI

China (CN)

Meizhou, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Andrea Albert Catala

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

snail protection ring

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B 001 AUK TYG · Amazon.de · disclosed 2013-06-26

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested plant protective grille lacked novelty and individual character because an identical Amazon-offered design had been on the market since 26/06/2013.
  • The holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.de printout with ASIN and date as sufficient internet disclosure evidence under Article 7 EUDR.
  • Comparing the designs directly, the Division found them identical apart from an immaterial shade difference and held the contested design lacked novelty.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124779

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258