DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008572598-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-14

000126735

Contested design: 008572598-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 008572598-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ooni Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Broxburn, United Kingdom

Holder · RCD owner

Foshan Hanshi Heating Equipment Manufactuere Co.,LTD.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Guangdong, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCDD1

KODA 12 pizza oven design

006719472-0003 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-08-23

Web disclosureD2

Ooni KODA 12 pizza oven

applicant website and YouTube · disclosed 2019-02-26

Web disclosureD3⚠ rejected as evidence

Ooni KODA 16 pizza oven

alleged applicant website and online materials

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over D1, D2 and D3, arguing the contested pizza oven shared the same overall structure, legs, mouth and proportions.
  • The holder disputed disclosure of D2 and D3 and argued informed users of cooking ovens are attentive purchasers who would notice the contested design's angular body, trapezoid mouth and different knob placement.
  • The Division accepted D1 and D2 as disclosed prior art but found the evidence insufficient to prove disclosure of D3.
  • The Division found at least average design freedom and held the contested design's more angular, faceted housing and other shape differences created a different overall impression from D1 and D2.
  • The application was therefore rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129481

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)077
000129484

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129502

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129503

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129482

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129483

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129501

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000130704

vs Shenzhen Yisi Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-22Art 25(1)(b)077