DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008572598-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-14

000126755

Contested design: 008572598-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 008572598-0002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ooni Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Broxburn, United Kingdom

Holder · RCD owner

Foshan Hanshi Heating Equipment Manufactuere Co.,LTD.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Guangdong,, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCDD1

pizza oven

006719472-0003 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-08-23

Web disclosureD2

pizza oven

KODA 12 · Ooni website; YouTube · disclosed 2019-02-26

Web disclosureD3⚠ rejected as evidence

pizza oven

KODA 16 · applicant website / social media / online articles

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over D1 and over Ooni KODA 12 and KODA 16 prior disclosures.
  • Holder disputed disclosure of D2 and D3 and argued informed users would notice the ovens' different body shape, mouth, paneling and knob placement.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 and D2 but found the evidence insufficient to prove disclosure of D3 before the filing date.
  • Comparing the contested design with D1 and D2, the Division found clear overall-form differences, so the design retained individual character and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129481

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)077
000129484

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129502

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129503

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129482

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129483

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129501

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000130704

vs Shenzhen Yisi Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-22Art 25(1)(b)077