DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015047701-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-23

000128920

Contested design: 015047701-0009

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and the contested EU design is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015047701-0009 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ruxian Huangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Cononlux Technology Co., Limitedvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shenzhen City, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 1

Amazon offer for the Palmina 901 LED Table lamp

ASIN B0CN7F1WR5; https://www.amazon.de · Amazon.de · disclosed 2023-11-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the desk lamp lacked novelty and individual character because an Amazon listing disclosed an identical design before the filing date.
  • Holder contested the disclosure evidence, claimed the designs differed in colour, material, stem and lampshade, and argued the designer's freedom was limited.
  • The Division accepted Annex 1 as sufficient internet disclosure from 13/11/2023 and treated online retail evidence as probative prior art.
  • Given at least average designer freedom, the shared circular base, slender stem and flat round shade dominated; the minor differences did not change the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268