DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008804603-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-11-03

000127857

Contested design: 008804603-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 0088046030001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Zante LTD Management Group Spółka Komandytowavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Warszawa, Poland

Represented by

Anna-Maria Sobczak

Holder · RCD owner

KDC Pomorzanka Sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

Preżmierowo, Poland

Represented by

Tomasz Cudnoch

Prior art cited (5)

Trade mark⚠ rejected as evidence

Combined trade mark showing overlapping jelly slices in a round container

Polish trade mark No R. 170 244 · Polish Patent Office · disclosed 2003-05-05

Trade mark⚠ rejected as evidence

Shape trade mark relied on as showing the contested jelly-slice design

EU trade mark No 18 627 028 · TMview · disclosed 2022-02-10

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

Offer for 'GALARETKA W CUKRZE MIX OWOCOWA CYTRYNKA ZOSIA 1KG' showing jelly slices

Allegro offer No 13 617 529 819 · Allegro

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

Offer for 'Galaretki w cukrze CYTRYNKI-1,5 kg Plumeria' showing jelly slices

Allegro offer No 9 983 712 540 · Allegro

Prior use

Claimed use of the contested jelly-slice design by the holder since 1980

Holder's letter dated 25/09/2024 · Holder's cease and desist letter

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant claimed the design lacked novelty and individual character based on earlier Polish and EU trade marks, Allegro product listings, and the holder's own long-standing use.
  • Holder argued the cited trade marks and listings did not disclose a clearly identifiable prior design comparable with the registered three-view design and that the internet evidence was unreliable.
  • The Division found the trade mark imagery too unclear, the EU trade mark too late, and the Allegro evidence undated, untranslated, and not self-contained for proving disclosure.
  • Because no sound prior disclosure was established under Articles 5 to 7 EUDR, the invalidity application failed and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

01.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129516

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14Art 25(1)(b)017
000129581

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14Art 25(1)(b)017
000123436

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2024-08-13Art 25(1)(b)017
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)015
000126695

vs IKOONA SP. Z O.O.

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)015
000127156

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)015
000127155

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)015
000127157

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)015