DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002556217-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-11-03

000129201

Contested design: 002556217-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen EU-Geschmacksmusters Nr. 002556217-0002 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Pfillo GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Düsseldorf, Deutschland

Represented by

Jörg Brettschneider

Holder · RCD owner

MCA furniture GmbH

Germany (DE)

Schieder-Schwalenberg, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

Website extracts concerning the 'Stressless' chair and product/company history

https://www.stressless.com/de-de/ueber-uns/stressless-geschichte · stressless.com

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, alleging the contested chair design was essentially a copy of Ekornes's long-marketed 'Stressless' chair.
  • The holder requested rejection of the application, arguing that the contested design created a different overall impression from the cited Stressless disclosure.
  • The Division held the internet extracts did not adequately prove prior disclosure because they lacked a clear source, the relevant design view, and a verifiable disclosure date before the contested filing date.
  • Because prior disclosure was not established under Article 7, the evidence did not support the Article 25(1)(b) invalidity grounds based on Articles 4, 5, and 6, so the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberThorsten ICKENROTH

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000128656

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)067
000128978

vs Franco Ferri S.R.L.

2026-04-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000131627

vs Shuifa XIE

2026-03-31Art 25(1)(b)067
000130974

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10Art 25(1)(b)067
000128937

vs Liyou Industrial Co., Ltd

2026-02-24Art 25(1)(b)067
000128579

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)067