DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015039369-0013

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-11-13

000129806

Contested design: 015039369-0013

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015039369-0013 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Silin Livia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Zunyi, Guizhou, China

Represented by

METIDA

Holder · RCD owner

Suzhou Bimeng Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

433.92 MHz Garage Door Opener remote control

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B0C9HPWWWB · Amazon.de · disclosed 2023-06-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued that an earlier Amazon-disclosed remote control destroyed novelty and individual character, and that designer freedom for such products was broad.
  • Applicant relied on an Amazon.de screenshot for the 433.92 MHz Garage Door Opener showing ASIN B0C9HPWWWB and availability since 27/06/2023; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon screenshot as sufficient proof of public disclosure and found that remote-control designers enjoy broad freedom apart from functional constraints.
  • Because the compared designs created the same overall impression on the informed user, the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148