DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008400915-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-11-24

000130181

Contested design: 008400915-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 008400915-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hui Yaovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Yulin City, Shanxi Province, China

Represented by

Pier Francesco Pistuddi

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Zongyuan Technology Co., Ltd

China (CN)

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Joanna Dargiewicz

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureAnnex 1

Amazon offer for '08/Set of 10 Tea Towels' showing a cloth wrapped around an unknown object.

ASIN B01A LFO LNA · amazon.de · disclosed 2018-02-27

Web disclosureAnnex 2

Amazon offer for 'TreeBox Straining Cloth' showing a cloth or serviette.

ASIN B 07R B9J YRK · amazon.de · disclosed 2019-09-09

Web disclosureAnnex 3⚠ rejected as evidence

Amazon offer for 'XelNaga 5 Pack Cheesecloth' showing light-coloured cloths stacked together.

ASIN B 088 F3V VSD · amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2020-05-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on three earlier Amazon-disclosed cloth or sieve designs.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted disclosure for prior designs 1 and 2, rejected prior design 3 as insufficiently represented, and found the accepted prior designs created different overall impressions.
  • The application was rejected because the evidence did not establish invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) EUDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

05.0507.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129481

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)077
000129501

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129483

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129502

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129482

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129484

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129503

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000130704

vs Shenzhen Yisi Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-22Art 25(1)(b)077