DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015050284-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-10

000127856

Contested design: 015050284-0001

EUDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno o modello dell'UE registrato n.- 015050284 è respinta. Il richiedente sopporta l'onere delle spese del titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Joanna Tymczyjvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Poznań, Polonia

Holder · RCD owner

Top Sale Spółka z Ograniczonto Odpowiedzialnościtovia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Warszawa, Polonia

Represented by

Anna-Maria Sobczak

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

hot-water bottle / heating pad

015003962-0001 · EUIPO Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2022-11-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 25(1)(d)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested design copied its earlier EU design and earlier public disclosures, so it lacked novelty and individual character and also conflicted with its prior registered design.
  • Holder replied that the contested design had a different overall tree-like shape, rounded upper part and characteristic stitching, so it remained new and individually distinctive.
  • The Division held Article 25(1)(d) was inapplicable because the earlier EU design had been published before the contested filing date, and it disregarded untranslated or insufficiently identified evidence.
  • Comparing the validly invoked earlier RCD with the contested design, the Division found significant differences in shape, lines, thickness and proportions, producing a different overall impression.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENTO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129481

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)077
000129502

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129484

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129483

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129482

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129501

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129503

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000130704

vs Shenzhen Yisi Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-22Art 25(1)(b)077