DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009176290-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-12

000130301

Contested design: 009176290-0004

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested EU design is declared invalid; and the holder must pay EUR 720 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 009176290-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Guangzhou Topmax Enterprise Limitedvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Guangzhou, China

Holder · RCD owner

Peter Callsen

Denmark (DK)

hellerup, Denmark

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Blomus Outdoor Diwan grey sofa, specifically the chaise longue module

https://www.amazon.de (ASIN B 09Y Z1X 7R3) · Amazon · disclosed 2022-04-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested garden-chair design lacked novelty and individual character over a modular outdoor sofa disclosed on Amazon on 27/04/2022.
  • Holder stated that it did not wish to submit observations on the substance of the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout as sufficient internet disclosure under Article 7(1) and found the prior module and contested design created the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b), and the holder was ordered to bear the costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068