DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008862106-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-12

000130421

Contested design: 008862106-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 720 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0088621060002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Renqiang Zhaovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Zunyi City, Guizhou Province, China

Holder · RCD owner

Hangzhou Motuo Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (4)

PatentAnnex 1

Chinese design patent for a wall-mounted hat rack

CN 306736360 S (application No 202130050816.6) · China design patent publication · disclosed 2021-08-06

Web disclosureAnnex 2

prior design marketed online

www.amazon.com · Amazon

Web disclosureAnnex 3

prior design exhibited on an online portal

other portal

Web disclosureAnnex 4

prior design exhibited on an online portal

other portal

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over Chinese design patent CN 306736360 S and also alleged lack of novelty based on online prior designs.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the Chinese design patent and found both wall-mounted hat rack designs shared the same overall impression despite minor differences.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR, so the RCD was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068