DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015024193-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-18

000130363

Contested design: 015024193-0001

EUDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for invalidity against registered EU design No 015024193-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

La demande en nullité du dessin ou modèle de l’UE enregistré no 015024193-0001 est rejetée. La demanderesse supporte les frais de la titulaire, fixés à 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Robert David Harrington-Jonesvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Londres, Royaume-Uni

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Lintengze Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shenzhen, Chine

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (3)

National designD1

ice cube trays

UK design No 6272863 · United Kingdom Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2023-05-05

National designD2

ice cube trays

Chinese design No 306932780 · Chinese design database · disclosed 2021-11-12

National designD3⚠ rejected as evidence

defrosting frame for ice trays

Korean design No 30-1224404 · Korean design database · disclosed 2023-07-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on earlier UK, Chinese, and Korean ice-tray designs said to disclose the same essential features before filing.
  • The holder was invited to comment on the application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 and D2 before the contested filing date, but found D3 post-dated that filing date and could not serve as earlier prior art.
  • Comparing the contested design with D1 and D2, the Division found visible differences beyond insignificant details, so the novelty attack failed and the application was rejected.

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.10

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129481

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)077
000129501

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129502

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129503

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129482

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129484

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129483

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000130704

vs Shenzhen Yisi Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-22Art 25(1)(b)077