DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008566814-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-19

000128695

Contested design: 008566814-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 008566814-0002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Kartell S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Noviglio (MI), Italy

Holder · RCD owner

Francesco Petruzzellivia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Andria, Italy

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCDD1

chairs [seats]

EU design registration No 001124911-0006 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2009-05-05

Registered RCDD2

chairs [seats]

EU design registration No 001124911-0010 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2009-05-05

Web disclosureD3a-c

Article 'philippe starck: masters chair for Kartell' showing D1 commercialised in different colours

https://www.designboom.com · designboom.com · disclosed 2020-08-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier EU designs D1 and D2 and related web disclosure D3a-c.
  • The holder argued the contested chair differed in the backrest, armrests, seat, leg positioning, and colour, and maintained that it remained new and individually distinctive.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1, D2, and D3a-c, but found the backrest structure, armrest curvature, and overall appearance created a different overall impression.
  • The application was rejected because the contested design had individual character and therefore also could not lack novelty vis-a-vis the invoked prior designs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000128656

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)067
000128978

vs Franco Ferri S.R.L.

2026-04-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000131627

vs Shuifa XIE

2026-03-31Art 25(1)(b)067
000130974

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10Art 25(1)(b)067
000128937

vs Liyou Industrial Co., Ltd

2026-02-24Art 25(1)(b)067
000128579

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)067