DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015079357-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-01-30

000130705

Contested design: 015079357-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 720 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015079357-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

NPD Partnership Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Surrey, United Kingdom

Represented by

The Legal Group

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Yuanpu Technology Co., Ltd

China (CN)

Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Jesús Eladio Sánchez Silva

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnexes I-V

wheel/game board design used in the 'Pim Pam Pet The Battle' / 'Tapple' alphabet game

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06PyvBCIr2Y · YouTubeNL / Jumbo Nederland B.V., corroborated by boardgamegeek.com and TÜV Rheinland materials

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicants argued that their earlier alphabet game wheel design had been publicly disclosed in 2012/2013 through sketches, market materials, YouTube screenshots, boardgamegeek.com, and a test certificate.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest the applicants' facts, evidence, or arguments.
  • The Division found the annexes individually incomplete but, assessed together, sufficient to prove public disclosure of the earlier wheel design before the contested filing date.
  • The contested design shared the prior design's essential shape and configuration; differences in colours, typefaces, and bottom views did not create a different overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character and had to be declared invalid under Article 25(1)(b) with Article 6 EUDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218