DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004518199-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-02

000130086

Contested design: 004518199-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0045181990001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

ISO Trade SP. Z.O.O.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Legnickie Pole, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Cross Bordep (Hk) Co., Limitedvia PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

Kwai Chung, Hong Kong

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD2.1

rehabilitation rotor with counter / pedal exerciser

https://archiwum.allegro.pl; code 6612943636 · Allegro · disclosed 2016-11-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested pedal exerciser lacked novelty and individual character because very similar designs had already been disclosed and used in trade before the filing date.
  • It relied in particular on an Allegro listing dated 27/11/2016 for a rehabilitation rotor with counter and also filed market examples to show limited design freedom.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations, so the Invalidity Division assessed disclosure and individual character on the applicant's evidence alone.
  • The Division accepted the Allegro disclosure, found the overall impressions practically identical despite average designer freedom, and declared the contested design invalid for lack of individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130710

vs Tao Zhu

2026-01-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218