DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008868111-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-12

000130976

Contested design: 008868111-0002

EUDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, EU design No 008868111-0002 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 720 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 008868111-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Baohong Zhouvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Wuhua, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Holder · RCD owner

Jun Che

China (CN)

Jiangmen City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

LED outdoor floodlight shown in an Amazon offer page

ASIN B 089 Y73 4CD · Amazon.de · disclosed 2020-03-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested LED light lacked novelty and individual character because it copied earlier LED floodlight designs disclosed before filing, including an Amazon offer page.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure or the design comparison.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.de printout with ASIN B 089 Y73 4CD as sufficient proof of public internet disclosure from 2020-03-15 under Article 7(1) EUDR.
  • Given at least average design freedom, the similarities outweighed the minor differences, so the contested design produced the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 720 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268