DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015092373-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-13

000130944

Contested design: 015092373-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear EUR 720 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150923730001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hui Yaovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Yulin City, Shanxi Province, China

Represented by

Arcade & Asociados

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

China (CN)

Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Emilio Zeininger

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Paper bags sold under the 'ihaspoko' offer.

ASIN B0C 9GN 13T4 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2023-06-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested paper bag design was an identical reproduction of a paper bag disclosed on Amazon before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division treated the Amazon listing as sufficient internet disclosure and found the compared bags identical; colour, material and sticker details were irrelevant because they were not part of the contested drawings.
  • The design lacked novelty under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 5 EUDR, so the application was upheld and the design invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129228

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098