DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015101435-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-07

000131965

Contested design: 015101435-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear fixed costs of EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015101435-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Miele & Cie. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Gütersloh, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

dustbags

EU design registration No 015071195-0008 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2024-09-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant claimed the contested dustbag design lacked novelty and individual character because it reproduced the earlier design almost entirely, with only negligible differences.
  • Applicant relied in particular on earlier EU design registration No 015071195-0008 for dustbags, published before the contested filing date.
  • Holder filed no observations despite being invited to respond to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier design was disclosed, the designer's freedom was at least average, and the shared central circular interface and symmetrical holding plate dominated the overall impression.
  • The contested design did not create a different overall impression on the informed user, so it lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailé SAKALAITE-ORLOVSKIENE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129228

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098