DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007326905-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-27

000128636

Contested design: 007326905-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 007326905-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Sannv Jiangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Zhaoqing City, China

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Guangzhou, China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

Adapters [electricity]

EU design No 001404453-0004 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2014-05-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on earlier EU design No 001404453-0004 disclosed before the contested filing date.
  • The holder argued designer freedom was constrained by technical compatibility requirements and that differences in the plug, segmentation, alignment, and proportions created a different overall impression.
  • The Division found the earlier EU design had been validly disclosed, that designer freedom was only partially restricted, and that the shared housing, plug placement, and cable configuration dominated the overall impression.
  • The contested design was held to lack individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR, so the invalidity application was upheld and the design declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000130483

vs Haikou Mingshu Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138