DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006688404-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-03-06

000127339

Contested design: 006688404-0004

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen EU-Geschmacksmusters Nr. 006688404-0004 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Santé Magyarország Korlátolt Felelősségű Társaságvia PDF extraction

Hungary (HU)

Szada, Ungarn

Holder · RCD owner

Henkel AG & Co. KGaA

Germany (DE)

Düsseldorf, Deutschland

Represented by

Jörg Schmidt

Prior art cited (9)

Publication1⚠ rejected as evidence

Henkel press release presenting 'Persil Discs: Deutschlands erstes 4-Kammern-System' with product images

Henkel press release · disclosed 2019-05-28

Other2⚠ rejected as evidence

Email correspondence stating Henkel 4in1 washing capsules were launched on the German market on 1 July 2019; no design shown

Henkel employee email · disclosed 2024-05-22

Web disclosure3⚠ rejected as evidence

Amazon.de listing for 'Persil 4in1 Discs' with product image

ASIN B07SHFYQH2 · amazon.de · disclosed 2019-06-30

Web disclosure4⚠ rejected as evidence

Customer reviews for the Amazon.de 'Persil 4in1 Discs' listing

ASIN B07SHFYQH2 · amazon.de

Prior use5⚠ rejected as evidence

Invoice from Arzenal Ltd. for 'Pro Clean Oxi Persil detergent 38 count' with attached product photos

Arzenal Ltd. invoice · disclosed 2018-10-01

Prior use6⚠ rejected as evidence

Invoice from Arzenal Ltd. for 'Pro Clean Oxi Persil detergent 38 count' and 'Pro Clean Oxi High Persil detergent 38count' with attached product photos

Arzenal Ltd. invoice · disclosed 2018-10-01

Web disclosure7⚠ rejected as evidence

Undated Google and barcodeindex.com search results for the article number shown in Annex 6

Google and barcodeindex.com

Web disclosure8⚠ rejected as evidence

Amazon.com listing for 'Persil Discs Laundry Detergent Pacs, Original, 16 Count' with product image

ASIN B07PMQQ216 · amazon.com · disclosed 2019-03-05

Other9⚠ rejected as evidence

Photograph of a screen showing an Excel table allegedly from dm Drogeriemarkt listing Persil Discs products

dm Drogeriemarkt spreadsheet photo · disclosed 2019-05-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)Article 14(3)Article 17

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on product images, invoices, Amazon listings, a press release, and related internet materials concerning Persil detergent capsules.
  • The holder argued that all cited disclosures originated from or were attributable to the holder and fell within the twelve-month grace period under Article 7(2), so they could not be used against the contested design.
  • The Division accepted that the holder was the designers' successor in title under Articles 14 and 17 and found the applicant had not rebutted that presumption with persuasive evidence.
  • Because none of the relied-on disclosures predated the grace-period cutoff before the 7 August 2019 filing date, no relevant earlier design disclosure was established and the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvan PRANDZHEV

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129481

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)077
000129484

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129502

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129482

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129503

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129483

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129501

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000130704

vs Shenzhen Yisi Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-22Art 25(1)(b)077