DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015092224-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-03-12

000131564

Contested design: 015092224-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application inadmissible

The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible and the invalidity fee is not refunded.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.

CostsNo costs order

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jinhui Zhouvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Xiangxiang City, Hunan Province, China

Represented by

Andrea Albert Catala

Holder · RCD owner

Novowise Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

United Kingdom

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(c)Article 25(2)Article 28(1)(c)(iii)Article 30(1)Article 52

Argument summary

  • Applicant claimed entitlement to the contested design, said it owned corresponding Chinese design CN 308505100 S, and requested suspension if a court ruling on entitlement was considered necessary.
  • No substantive response from the holder is recorded; the decision turned on admissibility after the Office invited the applicant to cure a deficiency.
  • The Division held that an entitlement-based invalidity application required particulars showing a court decision under Article 28(1)(c)(iii) EUDIR, and the applicant failed to provide one within the time limit.
  • Application rejected as inadmissible; the invalidity fee was not refunded.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberGaile SAKALAITE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130341

vs Mortensen Software Consulting ApS

2026-05-27215
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05215
000129624

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29215
000129661

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29215
000129621

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29215
000130709

vs Shantou Chenghai district Shuangjia plastic toy factory

2026-02-26215
000128937

vs Liyou Industrial Co., Ltd

2026-02-24215
000130683

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23215