DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006090502-0014

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-04-14

000129522

Contested design: 006090502-0014

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen EU-Geschmacksmusters Nr. 006090502-0014 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Pro-Form Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft.via PDF extraction

Hungary (HU)

Ecser, Ungarn

Holder · RCD owner

Messerle GmbH

Austria (AT)

Mäder, Österreich

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

food packaging shown on the applicant website

http://pro-form.hu · WaybackMachine · disclosed 2018-03-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on a prior disclosure on its website archived by WaybackMachine.
  • The holder argued the cited images were blurred and, in any event, the contested packaging differed through its diagonal division, protruding upper shape, proportions, and black lower part.
  • The Division accepted D1 as disclosed on 5 March 2018 via WaybackMachine but rejected the other internet page, technical drawing, and invoice as proof of public disclosure.
  • Comparing D1 with the contested design, the Division found substantial differences in shape, surface structure, proportions, and colour, so the contested design had individual character and remained novel.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberIvo TSENKOV

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129508

vs Messerle GmbH

2026-04-23Art 25(1)(b)097
000127995

vs Jaroslav Masopust

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)097
000129516

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14Art 25(1)(b)097
000128115

vs GREEN TEAM EUROPE A/S

2025-11-20Art 25(1)(b)097
000123774

vs Gusta Garden GmbH

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(b)097
000123875

vs Multiple Products B.V.

2024-10-15Art 25(1)(b)097
000124459

vs Gusta Garden GmbH

2024-10-04Art 25(1)(b)097
000124999

vs Europapa Handels GmbH

2024-09-05Art 25(1)(b)097