DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006090502-0034

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-04-23

000129508

Contested design: 006090502-0034

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against EU design No 006090502-0034 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen EU-Geschmacksmusters Nr. 006090502-0034 wird zurückgewiesen. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Pro-Form Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft.via PDF extraction

Hungary (HU)

Ecser, Ungarn

Holder · RCD owner

Messerle GmbH

Austria (AT)

Mäder, Österreich

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

food packaging shown on the applicant's website

http://pro-form.hu · Internet Archive WaybackMachine · disclosed 2018-03-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7Article 5(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested food-packaging design lacked novelty and individual character over D1, allegedly disclosed on its website and captured via the Wayback Machine.
  • The holder replied that the cited disclosures were blurred and unsuitable for comparison, and that the contested design had distinct diagonal division, bump structure, and proportions.
  • The Division accepted D1's disclosure through the archived website screenshot but rejected the other documents as proof of public disclosure.
  • Comparing D1 with the contested design, the Division found significant differences in the upper shape, lower structure, and proportions, so the contested design retained individual character and novelty.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberIvo TSENKOV

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129522

vs Messerle GmbH

2026-04-14Art 25(1)(b)097
000127995

vs Jaroslav Masopust

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)097
000129516

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14Art 25(1)(b)097
000128115

vs GREEN TEAM EUROPE A/S

2025-11-20Art 25(1)(b)097
000123774

vs Gusta Garden GmbH

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(b)097
000123875

vs Multiple Products B.V.

2024-10-15Art 25(1)(b)097
000124459

vs Gusta Garden GmbH

2024-10-04Art 25(1)(b)097
000124999

vs Europapa Handels GmbH

2024-09-05Art 25(1)(b)097