DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008937502-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-07

000131744

Contested design: 008937502-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 008937502-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Liyun Qianvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Holder · RCD owner

Beilei Ma

China (CN)

Zhejiang Province, China

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

baking paper cup shown in an Amazon listing

https://www.amazon.com; ASIN B09QX8TY1X · Amazon.com via Internet Archive · disclosed 2022-01-21

Publication⚠ rejected as evidence

blog article submitted to show long-standing use of baking papers; no comparable design shown

Food History Jottings: 'A review of the Marvellous Mrs Beeton, with Sophie Dahl. BBC.TWO' · Food History Jottings · disclosed 2011-09-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the baking paper cup design was dictated solely by technical function and also lacked novelty and individual character over an earlier Amazon disclosure.
  • The applicant relied mainly on an Internet Archive capture of an Amazon listing for ASIN B09QX8TY1X and also filed a blog article; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division rejected the technical-function objection, accepted the Amazon listing as prior public disclosure before filing, but found clear differences in material appearance, colour, folds, tabs and undisclosed outer sides.
  • The invalidity grounds under Articles 8(1), 6(1)(b) and 5(1)(b) EUDR failed, so the application was rejected and costs of EUR 400 were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129481

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)077
000129484

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129502

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129482

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129503

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129483

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129501

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000130704

vs Shenzhen Yisi Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-22Art 25(1)(b)077