DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015011553-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-11

000131765

Contested design: 015011553-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno o modello dell’UE registrato n. 015011553-0001 è respinta. 2. Il richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese del titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Liyun Qianvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Xingbo Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Pier Francesco Pistuddi

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCDD1

baking bowls

RCD No 008937502-0001 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2022-04-29

Web disclosureD2

baking bowl offered on Amazon

Amazon ASIN B09QX8TY1X · Amazon / Wayback Machine · disclosed 2022-01-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character and argued the baking-paper container's features were dictated solely by technical function.
  • The applicant relied on earlier RCD D1 and an Amazon web disclosure D2; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division found the technical-function objection unproven because no convincing evidence showed the design choices were solely function-driven.
  • It held D1 and D2 were disclosed but visually differed in shape, pleating, tabs, material, color, and wall inclination, so the contested design retained individual character and novelty.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129481

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)077
000129484

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129502

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129482

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129503

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129483

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129501

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000130704

vs Shenzhen Yisi Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-22Art 25(1)(b)077