DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015101133-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-19

000131848

Contested design: 015101133-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Registered EU design No 015101133-0002 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015101133-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hangzhou Qiuzhichan Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Holder · RCD owner

Solecom-Y OÜ

EE

Tallinn, Estonia

Prior art cited (1)

National design

combination seatbelt cutter and window breakers

UK design registration No 6273375 · UK Design Bulletin · disclosed 2023-05-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over an earlier UK design published before the contested design filing date.
  • The applicant relied on UK design registration No 6273375 for combination seatbelt cutter and window breakers; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division found the earlier UK registration sufficiently disclosed under Article 7(1) EUDR and compared the designs from the informed user perspective.
  • It held that the shared structure and features outweighed minor colour and surface-pattern differences, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 720 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

29.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131866

vs Solecom-Y OÜ

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)298
000116451

vs Banale S.r.l.

2022-10-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)298
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5