DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001733239-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2021-01-11

R1825/2019-3

Contested design: 001733239-0001

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed and the invalidity applicant must bear the costs of the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die Beschwerde wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten des Nichtigkeits- und des Beschwerdeverfahrens.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

SWITCHLAB INC.via PDF extraction

Taiwan (TW)

8F., No. 66, Zhongzheng Rd., Xinzhuang Dist., New Taipei City 24243, Taiwan

Holder · RCD owner

WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Hansastr. 27, 32423 Minden, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1⚠ rejected as evidence

electrical connector / printed-circuit-board terminal block

RCD No 1691577-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2010-04-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 6(1)Article 7(2)Article 70(1)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant argued that the contested connector was an invisible component of a complex product and lacked individual character over the holder's earlier RCD D1.
  • The design holder argued that D1 fell within the Article 7(2) grace period because it was the holder's own earlier publication and therefore could not be used against the contested RCD.
  • The Board agreed with the holder that publication of the holder's own earlier registered design within the grace period did not count as earlier prior art for novelty or individual character purposes.
  • With no qualifying earlier design under Article 7, the invalidity application failed and the appeal was dismissed.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurE. Fink
  • MemberC. Bartos
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R1829/2019-32021-05-27Decision confirmedArt 7(2), Art 4(2)7
R1828/2019-32021-05-27Decision confirmedArt 7(2), Art 4(2)7
R1827/2019-32021-05-27Decision confirmedArt 7(2), Art 4(2)7
R0677/2023-32024-03-07Decision confirmedArt 7(2)5
R0489/2022-32023-12-19Decision confirmedArt 4(2)5
R2336/2022-32023-11-27Decision confirmedArt 7(2)5
R0878/2022-32023-02-16Decision confirmedArt 4(2)5
R1696/2021-32022-08-25Decision confirmedArt 4(2)5