DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001842295-0002

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2021-05-27

R1829/2019-3

Contested design: 001842295-0002

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed and the invalidity applicant must bear the costs of both the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die Beschwerde wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten des Nichtigkeits- und des Beschwerdeverfahrens.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

SWITCHLAB INC.via PDF extraction

Taiwan (TW)

8F., No. 66, Zhongzheng Rd., Xinzhuang Dist., New Taipei City 24243, Taiwan

Holder · RCD owner

WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Hansastr. 27, 32423 Minden, Germany

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCDD1⚠ rejected as evidence

electrical connector

RCD No 1733239-0003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2010-07-22

Registered RCDD2⚠ rejected as evidence

electrical connector

RCD No 1691577-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2010-04-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 6Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant argued that the contested electrical connector was not visible in normal use and lacked individual character over the holder’s earlier RCDs Nos 1733239-0003 and 1691577-0001.
  • The design holder argued that those earlier designs were its own disclosures and therefore protected by the Article 7(2) grace period.
  • The Board held that the earlier registered designs could not be relied on because they were published within the grace period before filing of the contested RCD.
  • The appeal was dismissed and the invalidity applicant was ordered to bear the costs of both instances.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurE. Fink
  • MemberC. Bartos
  • Registrarp.o. R. Vidal

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R1828/2019-32021-05-27Decision confirmedArt 7(2), Art 4(2)7
R1827/2019-32021-05-27Decision confirmedArt 7(2), Art 4(2)7
R1825/2019-32021-01-11Decision confirmedArt 7(2), Art 4(2)7
R0677/2023-32024-03-07Decision confirmedArt 7(2)5
R0489/2022-32023-12-19Decision confirmedArt 4(2)5
R2336/2022-32023-11-27Decision confirmedArt 7(2)5
R0878/2022-32023-02-16Decision confirmedArt 4(2)5
R1696/2021-32022-08-25Decision confirmedArt 4(2)5