Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2021-05-27
R1827/2019-3
Contested design: 001733239-0003
Outcome
The appeal is dismissed and the invalidity applicant must bear the costs of both the invalidity and appeal proceedings.
Show verbatim operative text(de)
1. Die Beschwerde wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten des Nichtigkeits- und des Beschwerdeverfahrens.
CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
SWITCHLAB INC.via PDF extraction
Taiwan (TW)
8F., No. 66, Zhongzheng Rd., Xinzhuang Dist., New Taipei City 24243, Taiwan
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbHvia PDF extraction
Germany (DE)
Hansastr. 27, 32423 Minden, Germany
Represented by
Prior art cited (1)
electrical connector
RCD No 1691577-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2010-04-14
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The invalidity applicant argued that the registered views were unclear, that the contested connector was an invisible component of a complex product, and that it lacked individual character over earlier RCD No 1691577-0001.
- ›The design holder argued that the views clearly represented one design, that printed-circuit-board terminals can remain visible in normal use, and that the earlier design fell within the Article 7(2) grace period.
- ›The Board agreed that the earlier RCD was the holder’s own disclosure within the 12-month grace period and therefore could not be relied on against the contested design.
- ›The appeal was dismissed and the invalidity applicant was ordered to bear the costs of both instances.
Deciding panel
- ChairG. Humphreys
- RapporteurE. Fink
- MemberC. Bartos
- Registrarp.o. R. Vidal
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| deGerman | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1828/2019-3 | 2021-05-27 | Decision confirmed | Art 7(2), Art 4(2) | — | 7 |
| R1829/2019-3 | 2021-05-27 | Decision confirmed | Art 7(2), Art 4(2) | — | 7 |
| R1825/2019-3 | 2021-01-11 | Decision confirmed | Art 7(2), Art 4(2) | — | 7 |
| R0677/2023-3 | 2024-03-07 | Decision confirmed | Art 7(2) | — | 5 |
| R0489/2022-3 | 2023-12-19 | Decision confirmed | Art 4(2) | — | 5 |
| R2336/2022-3 | 2023-11-27 | Decision confirmed | Art 7(2) | — | 5 |
| R0878/2022-3 | 2023-02-16 | Decision confirmed | Art 4(2) | — | 5 |
| R1696/2021-3 | 2022-08-25 | Decision confirmed | Art 4(2) | — | 5 |