DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005658507-0007

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2022-11-14

R0678/2021-3

Contested design: 005658507-0007

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed, and the design holder must bear the costs of the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die Beschwerde wird zurueckgewiesen. 2. Die Inhaberin traegt die Kosten des Nichtigkeits- und des Beschwerdeverfahrens.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Out of the blue KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Beim neuen Damm 28, 28865 Lilienthal, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

MYDO GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Osterfeldstraße 6, 22529 Hamburg, Deutschland

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureD1

Green Maneki-neko figurine shown in a Diminuto Cielo Facebook post

facebook.com/diminutocieloshop/photos · Facebook · disclosed 2014-11-05

Web disclosureD2

Red Maneki-neko figurine among multiple colour variants

Diminuto Cielo Facebook post · Facebook · disclosed 2015-02-28

Web disclosureD3

Maneki-neko figurine shown on Instagram

Diminuto Cielo Instagram post · Instagram · disclosed 2015-03-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The design holder argued that the Facebook and Instagram materials did not prove a relevant public disclosure and that colour, finish and back details distinguished the contested cat figurine.
  • The invalidity applicant maintained that Diminuto Cielo's time-stamped social-media posts disclosed the earlier figurines before filing and that the red cat shown as D2 created the same overall impression.
  • The Board held that the earlier figurine D2 had been disclosed before the filing date and that the minor differences in tone, surface finish, rear details and base support did not change the overall impression.
  • The appeal was dismissed and the invalidation for lack of individual character was maintained.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurE. Fink
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • Registrarp.o. M. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0499/2023-32024-03-04Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R2422/2022-32024-01-30Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R0856/2022-32023-06-30Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R1562/2022-32023-05-31Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R1103/2022-32023-02-15Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R0683/2021-32022-11-14Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R0682/2021-32022-11-14Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R0677/2021-32022-11-14Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5