DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005658507-0011

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2022-11-14

R0682/2021-3

Contested design: 005658507-0011

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed, and the design holder must bear the costs of the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die Beschwerde wird zurueckgewiesen. 2. Die Inhaberin traegt die Kosten des Nichtigkeits- und des Beschwerdeverfahrens.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Out of the blue KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Beim neuen Damm 28, 28865 Lilienthal, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

MYDO GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Osterfeldstraße 6, 22529 Hamburg, Deutschland

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureD1

Green Maneki-neko figurine shown in a Diminuto Cielo Facebook post

facebook.com/diminutocieloshop/photos · Facebook · disclosed 2014-11-05

Web disclosureD2

White Maneki-neko figurine among multiple colour variants

Diminuto Cielo Facebook post · Facebook · disclosed 2015-02-28

Web disclosureD3

Maneki-neko figurine shown on Instagram

Diminuto Cielo Instagram post · Instagram · disclosed 2015-03-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The design holder argued that the prior social-media disclosures were insufficient and that the contested white figurine differed in finish, collar and rear-side details.
  • The invalidity applicant relied on the Diminuto Cielo evidence and argued that the earlier white cat D2 generated the same overall impression.
  • The Board held that D2 had been disclosed before filing and that the gloss, collar details, rear features and support plate did not outweigh the strong similarities in the figurines' overall appearance.
  • The appeal was dismissed and the invalidation for lack of individual character was upheld.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurE. Fink
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • Registrarp.o. M. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0499/2023-32024-03-04Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R2422/2022-32024-01-30Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R0856/2022-32023-06-30Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R1562/2022-32023-05-31Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R1103/2022-32023-02-15Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R0683/2021-32022-11-14Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R0678/2021-32022-11-14Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5
R0677/2021-32022-11-14Decision confirmedArt 7(1)5