DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006645693-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-07-26

R2374/2023-3

Contested design: 006645693-0001

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Other

The Board suspends the appeal proceedings until the conciliation procedure between the parties before the Tribunal de Commerce de Paris is concluded and directs the parties to keep it informed of that conciliation.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Suspender el presente procedimiento de recurso hasta la conclusión del procedimiento de conciliación entre las partes ante el Tribunal de Commerce de Paris; 2. Requerir a las partes a que informen puntualmente a la Sala sobre el estado del procedimiento de conciliación antes referido.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Laboratoires Filorga Cosmetiquesvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

2-4 rue de Lisbonne, 75008 Paris, Francia

Represented by

Elzaburu, S.L.P.

Holder · RCD owner

Faca France Recipients Pour Cosmetique S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Ctra. del Mig, 1-13, 08940 Cornella de Llobregat, España

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 56Article 57Article 34Article 71(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The design holder appealed the Invalidity Division's decision declaring the contested bottle design invalid for lack of novelty and individual character under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 4(1) CDR.
  • The invalidity applicant asked for the appeal to be dismissed and later filed no observations on the holder's requests to suspend the appeal because of parallel conciliation proceedings in Paris.
  • The Board found the appeal admissible but held that Article 71(1)(b) allowed suspension after balancing both parties' interests, given the parallel court conciliation covering the broader dispute including the contested RCD.
  • The appeal proceedings were suspended pending the outcome of the Paris conciliation, with both parties required to keep the Board informed.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurS. Rizzo
  • MemberC. Negro
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0507/2024-32026-01-12Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0160/2023-32025-03-31Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2129/2022-32025-03-31Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0182/2023-32025-03-31Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2381/2023-32024-07-26Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2382/2023-32024-07-26Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2378/2023-32024-07-26Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2376/2023-32024-07-26Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5