DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002341909-0003

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-07-26

R2378/2023-3

Contested design: 002341909-0003

CDRAppellant: holdermedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Other

The appeal proceedings are suspended until the conciliation proceedings between the parties before the Tribunal de Commerce de Paris are concluded, and the parties must keep the Board informed of their status.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Suspender el presente procedimiento de recurso hasta la conclusión del procedimiento de conciliación entre las partes ante el Tribunal de Commerce de Paris; 2. Requerir a las partes a que informen puntualmente a la Sala sobre el estado del procedimiento de conciliación antes referido.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Laboratoires Filorga Cosmetiquesvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

2-4 rue de Lisbonne, 75008 Paris, Francia

Represented by

Elzaburu, S.L.P.

Holder · RCD owner

Plasticos Faca, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Ctra. del Mig, 1-13, 08940 Cornella de Llobregat (Barcelona), España

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant had obtained cancellation of the contested RCD at first instance for alleged lack of novelty and individual character.
  • The design holder appealed that invalidity decision and later asked the Board to suspend the appeal because parallel conciliation proceedings were pending in Paris.
  • The invalidity applicant asked for the appeal to be dismissed and filed no observations on the suspension request when invited to do so.
  • Balancing the parties' interests, legal certainty, procedural economy and sound administration, the Board exercised its discretion to suspend the appeal pending the Paris conciliation outcome.
  • No substantive ruling on the invalidity grounds was made in this provisional decision.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurS. Rizzo
  • MemberC. Negro
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0507/2024-32026-01-12Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0160/2023-32025-03-31Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2129/2022-32025-03-31Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0182/2023-32025-03-31Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2381/2023-32024-07-26Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2374/2023-32024-07-26Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2376/2023-32024-07-26Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2382/2023-32024-07-26Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5