DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000739966-0004

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-07-26

R2376/2023-3

Contested design: 000739966-0004

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Other

The appeal proceedings are suspended until the parties' conciliation proceedings before the Tribunal de Commerce de Paris conclude, and the parties must keep the Board informed of that conciliation's status.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Suspender el presente procedimiento de recurso hasta la conclusión del procedimiento de conciliación entre las partes ante el Tribunal de Commerce de Paris; 2. Requerir a las partes a que informen puntualmente a la Sala sobre el estado del procedimiento de conciliación antes referido.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Laboratoires Filorga Cosmetiquesvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

2-4 rue de Lisbonne, 75008 Paris, Francia

Represented by

Elzaburu, S.L.P.

Holder · RCD owner

Aniceto Canamasas Puigbovia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Avenida de la Fama, 129, 08940 Cornella de Llobregat, Barcelona, España

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant sought cancellation of the contested RCD for lack of novelty and individual character under Articles 25(1)(b) and 4(1) CDR.
  • The Invalidity Division declared the contested design invalid and ordered the holder to bear costs; the holder appealed and sought annulment of that decision.
  • During the appeal, the holder requested suspension because parallel conciliation proceedings between the same parties were pending before the Tribunal de Commerce de Paris, and the invalidity applicant filed no observations.
  • The Board weighed both parties' interests and suspended the appeal for legal certainty, procedural economy and sound administration until the conciliation proceedings end.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurS. Rizzo
  • MemberC. Negro
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0507/2024-32026-01-12Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0160/2023-32025-03-31Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2129/2022-32025-03-31Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0182/2023-32025-03-31Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2381/2023-32024-07-26Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2374/2023-32024-07-26Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2378/2023-32024-07-26Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2382/2023-32024-07-26Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5