DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002680207-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-03-19

000010651

Contested design: 002680207-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community Design No 002680207-0001 is declared invalid; the holder must bear the applicant's costs, fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. Il disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 002680207-0001 è dichiarato nullo. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla richiedente, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Baralan International S.p.a.

Italy (IT)

Via Copernico, 34, 20090 Trezzano Sul Naviglio (MI), Italia

Represented by

Barzanò & Zanardo

Holder · RCD owner

D.C. Distribuzione s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Appia Nuova 669, 00179 Roma, Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Unregistered CDD1

bottle for nail polish/cosmetics marketed as Faby Line Eclectic

beautydea.it and supporting Faby Line publications · disclosed 2013-09-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 5(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and, in the alternative, lack of individual character over prior unregistered design D1 for a cosmetic bottle.
  • The holder argued that the registration showed all bottle measurements, but did not substantively address the novelty and individual-character objections.
  • The Division found D1 had been publicly disclosed before the filing date through web articles, press material, and magazine evidence accepted under Article 7 CDR.
  • It rejected the novelty ground because the compared views were not enough to prove identity with certainty, but found the overall impression sufficiently similar to deny individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098