DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002555425-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-16

000010476

Contested design: 002555425-0002

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 1500.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002555425-0002 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 1500.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €1,500

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

ORBEN Wasseraufbereitung GmbH & Co. KG

Germany (DE)

Industriepark Kalle Albert, Gebäude C 583, Kasteler Str. 45, 65203 Wiesbaden, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Unger Marketing International, LLC

United States (US)

425 Asylum Street, Bridgeport, CT 06610, United States of America

Prior art cited (2)

Utility modelEnclosure 3

water purifier bag used in a water conditioning system

DE 20 2015 0007 200 U1 · Germany · disclosed 2016-02-18

PublicationEnclosure 1

nLite HydroPower DI brochure showing the quick-change resin bag

VK510-HydroPowerDI-Brochure2015-DE.pdf · www.ungerglobal.com

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(a)Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the views were inconsistent under Article 3(a) CDR and that all essential features of the resin bag were solely dictated by technical function, relying on utility-model and brochure evidence.
  • Holder responded that the depictions were coherent, alternative bag designs existed, and the product retained individual character.
  • The Division rejected the Article 25(1)(a) challenge but held that the filled bag form, circular and elliptical shape, laced closure, and pleats were all chosen solely to achieve efficient filtration and easy replacement.
  • Because all essential features were technically dictated within Article 8(1) CDR, the contested RCD was declared invalid and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238