DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001431829-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-30

000010302

Contested design: 001431829-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity applications are upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicants' costs fixed at EUR 750 for each applicant, EUR 1,500 in total.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 001431829-0008 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicants’ costs, fixed at EUR 750 for each applicant, EUR 1500 in total.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €1,500

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mystic Products Import & Export, SLvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Carrer Guifre Nº 689, Badalona 08918, Spain

Holder · RCD owner

Tinnus Enterprises, LLC

United States (US)

3429 18th Street, Plano, Texas, United States of America

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

Ars Technica article “Bunch O Balloons will revolutionize water fights” showing the product

www.arstechnica.com · Ars Technica · disclosed 2014-07-27

Patent

European patent application for the same water-balloon filling product

EP 3 005 948 A2 · European patent application publication · disclosed 2016-04-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicants argued that the contested water-balloon filling design was excluded under Article 8(1) because all essential features were chosen solely to achieve its technical function.
  • The holder responded that the housing, straws, balloons, and bands reflected aesthetic choices and that alternative forms and the patent wording did not prove purely technical design.
  • The Division found the product's essential features matched its utilitarian function, showed no proven creative design effort, and the patent materials and product context supported that conclusion.
  • The invalidity applications were upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay both applicants' costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238