DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001058812-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-05-04

000010208

Contested design: 001058812-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 001058812-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 001058812-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Einrichtungshaus & Tischlerei Aster Gesellschaft m.b.H.

Austria (AT)

Mooslandl 20, 8921 Mooslandl, Österreich

Represented by

Mag. Thomas Riedler

Holder · RCD owner

Sabine Laher

Austria (AT)

Schulstr. 29, 3335 Weyer, Österreich

Prior art cited (3)

Catalog

Infrarotkabine "TM1 Elegance"

Produktkatalog der Delfin Handelsges.m.b.H., September 2007 · Delfin Handelsges.m.b.H. · disclosed 2007-09-01

Publication

Werbeanzeige für Thera-Med-Infrarotkabinen

Gesundes Kärnten 3/2007 · Kärntner Gebietskrankenkasse · disclosed 2007-09-28

Publication

Werbeanzeige für Thera-Med-Infrarotkabinen

FORUM Gesundheit 3/2007 · Oberösterreichische Gebietskrankenkasse

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested infrared cabin design had been marketed and advertised before the priority date, so it lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The holder invoked the 12-month grace period, disputed public availability before the priority date, and argued earlier cabins were different national designs.
  • The Division found the magazine advertisements made the earlier cabin design publicly available before 22/10/2007 and accepted that disclosure as proven by concrete evidence.
  • The earlier and contested designs were identical apart from immaterial color differences, so the contested RCD was not new and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAndré Gerd Günther BOSSE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidated236
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidated236
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidated236
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidated236
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidated236
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidated236
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidated236
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidated236