DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003298876-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-06-12

000010616

Contested design: 003298876-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicants must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 003298876-0001 is rejected. The applicants bear the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Rufin Sokołowskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Kubanska 32m7, 64-100 Leszno, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Premium Distribution Sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

ul. Niedziałkowskiego 28, 61578 Poznań, Poland

Represented by

Włodzimierz Januszkiewicz

Prior art cited (1)

National design

registered Polish design shown as a ring with a central through hole and six small holes

Polish design No 22397 · Polish office bulletin WUP 6/2016 · disclosed 2016-06-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicants sought invalidity for lack of novelty over an earlier Polish registered design and also alleged bad-faith filing by the holder.
  • The holder did not submit any observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted that the Polish design had been disclosed before the filing date but found material differences between the designs, so they were not identical under Article 5 CDR.
  • The bad-faith allegation was treated as inadmissible because it is not an Article 25(1) invalidity ground, and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000115888

vs SEDA INTERNATIONAL PACKAGING GROUP SPA

2022-02-09Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000115908

vs SEDA INTERNATIONAL PACKAGING GROUP SPA

2022-02-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000104119

vs Dzhihangir Ibryam

2019-10-17Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000103859

vs PHOENIX IND SA

2019-07-26Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000011140

vs GAMMA-A, SIA

2019-02-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000011251

vs Guy Vanhoutte

2019-01-28Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000011250

vs Guy Vanhoutte

2019-01-28Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000102462

vs TURCU GEANI-CRISTIAN

2018-12-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098