DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002672253-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-06-26

000010878

Contested design: 002672253-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0026722530003 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lego Juris A/S

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Brick Toy SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Bulevardul Uverturii 163A, 060945 Bucharest, Romania

Represented by

Elena Grecu

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureD1

LEGO mini-figure firefighter No 5613

https://mybricks.club/en/legoset/firefighter_4382/ · mybricks.club

Trade mark

three-dimensional mark for toys in Class 28

EUTM No 50 450 · EUIPO · disclosed 2000-04-18

Trade mark

three-dimensional mark for toys in Class 28

EUTM No 50 518 · EUIPO · disclosed 2000-06-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over prior design D1 and also relied on earlier three-dimensional EUTMs.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted D1 as disclosed at least since 2008, rejected novelty because the differences were not immaterial, but found no different overall impression given the broad design freedom.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000010585

vs East Sheen Industrial Co., Ltd.

2019-11-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010583

vs East Sheen Industrial Co., Ltd.

2019-11-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010584

vs East Sheen Industrial Co., Ltd.

2019-11-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000106679

vs GUANGDONG ZHENFENG SCIENCE AND EDUCATIONAL TOYS CO.,LTD

2019-10-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000104541

vs Guangming CHEN

2019-07-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010881

vs BRICK TOY SRL

2018-07-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010880

vs BRICK TOY SRL

2018-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010879

vs BRICK TOY SRL

2018-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110