DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003482520-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-07-05

000104541

Contested design: 003482520-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

La demande en nullité est accueillie. Le dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 0034825200001 est déclaré nul. La titulaire supporte les frais exposés par la demanderesse, fixés à 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/S

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Danemark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Chen Guangmingvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 12, Bumei revitalization of industrial Zone Guangyi street, Chenghai District Guangdong Province, 515 800 Shantou City, République populaire de Chine

Represented by

IPSIDE

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosuredessin et modèle 1

Amazon offer showing a LEGO figurine

ASIN B01K8XHM2W · Amazon · disclosed 2016-08-11

Trade markdessin ou modèle 2

three-dimensional figurine mark

EUTM application No 50 450 · EUIPO Official Bulletin · disclosed 1999-11-22

Trade markdessin ou modèle 3

three-dimensional figurine mark

EUTM application No 50 518 · EUIPO Official Bulletin · disclosed 1999-11-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested toy figurine lacked novelty and individual character and conflicted with earlier LEGO figurine disclosures and EU trade mark rights.
  • The applicant relied on an Amazon listing from 2016 and two earlier published three-dimensional EU trade mark applications showing LEGO figurines.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier figurine disclosures admissible and held that the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld and the contested RCD was declared invalid, with costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJessica LEWIS
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000010585

vs East Sheen Industrial Co., Ltd.

2019-11-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010584

vs East Sheen Industrial Co., Ltd.

2019-11-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010583

vs East Sheen Industrial Co., Ltd.

2019-11-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000106679

vs GUANGDONG ZHENFENG SCIENCE AND EDUCATIONAL TOYS CO.,LTD

2019-10-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010881

vs BRICK TOY SRL

2018-07-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010880

vs BRICK TOY SRL

2018-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010879

vs BRICK TOY SRL

2018-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010878

vs BRICK TOY SRL

2018-06-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110