DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005944535-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-10-23

000106679

Contested design: 005944535-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005944535-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/S

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Guangdong Zhenfeng Science and Educational Toys Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

South of Dengfeng Road, New City of Guangyi Street, Chenghai District, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Jose Izquierdo Faces

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureD1

LEGO figurine offer on Amazon

ASIN B01K8XHM2W · Amazon (amazon.co.uk) · disclosed 2016-08-11

Trade markD2

3D figurine mark

EUTM No 50 450 · Official Bulletin of the Office · disclosed 1999-11-22

Trade markD3

3D figurine mark

EUTM No 50 518 · Official Bulletin of the Office · disclosed 1999-11-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on earlier LEGO figurine disclosures and two earlier 3D EUTMs.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 from the Amazon listing and of D2 and D3 from their prior publication in the Office Bulletin.
  • Comparing the contested design mainly with D2, the Division found only minor differences and the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid in full, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000010585

vs East Sheen Industrial Co., Ltd.

2019-11-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010584

vs East Sheen Industrial Co., Ltd.

2019-11-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010583

vs East Sheen Industrial Co., Ltd.

2019-11-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000104541

vs Guangming CHEN

2019-07-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010881

vs BRICK TOY SRL

2018-07-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010880

vs BRICK TOY SRL

2018-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010879

vs BRICK TOY SRL

2018-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110
000010878

vs BRICK TOY SRL

2018-06-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)2110