DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001817149-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-07-17

000010611

Contested design: 001817149-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 001817149-0002 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

MAAN Sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

Podole 9, 05-600 Grójec, Poland

Represented by

Marta Malgorzata Miszczuk

Holder · RCD owner

‘Ciarko Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością’ Spółka Komandytowavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Okulickiego 10, 38-500 Sanok, Poland

Prior art cited (2)

CatalogItem 8

cooker hood design called OKC 951 S

Amica product catalogue 2009/2010 · Amica product catalogue

Web disclosureItem 11

comment posted on 13/06/2009 showing cooker hood design called Amica OKC 951 S

http://forum.muratordom.pl · forum.muratordom.pl · disclosed 2009-06-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier cooker hood disclosures including OKC 951 S before the 7 February 2011 filing date.
  • The holder argued some cited designs fell within the Article 7(2) grace period and that the earlier representations were incomplete and created a different overall impression.
  • The Division found the catalogue and forum evidence sufficient to prove prior disclosure of OKC 951 S and rejected the holder's objections to the quality and completeness of the representations.
  • Comparing the earlier design with the contested RCD, the Division found identical features differing only immaterially, so the RCD lacked novelty under Article 5.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238