DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000891494-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-08-08

000010516

Contested design: 000891494-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0008914940004 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant's costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Sanhua International Europe, S.L.

Spain (ES)

José Celestino Mutis 4, 2-I., 28703 S.S. Reyes (Madrid), Spain

Holder · RCD owner

Danfoss A/S

Denmark (DK)

Nordborgvej 81, DK-6430 Nordborg, Denmark

Represented by

Anders Stryhn-Johnsen

Prior art cited (2)

CatalogD1

expansion valve shown on pages 15-16 of an Emerson brochure

Emerson R-410A valve · Emerson brochure · disclosed 2013-05-01

CatalogD2

thermostatic expansion valves of the types T2 and TE2 shown in a Danfoss brochure

Danfoss T2 valve · Danfoss brochure · disclosed 2008-06-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing the thermostatic expansion valve was a hidden component of complex products and lacked individual character over D1 and D2.
  • The holder argued the valve remained visible during normal use, disputed the dating of D1, and maintained the cited prior valves created a different overall impression.
  • The Invalidity Division held the contested valve forms part of complex refrigeration and air-conditioning products but is not visible to end users during normal use once installed.
  • Because none of the RCD's features remained visible during normal use of the complex product, the Division declared the design entirely invalid and awarded costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberGaile SAKALAITE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238