DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002430462-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-08-31

000010930

Contested design: 002430462-0009

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 350 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002430462-0009 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Outfit7 Limited

United Kingdom (GB)

1st Floor, Sackville House, 143-149 Fenchurch Street, London, EC3M 6BN, United Kingdom

Holder · RCD owner

SC Viking International SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Bulevardul Camil Ressu nr. 68, Bloc 1B, Sc. A, Et. 3, Ap. 11, Camera 2, 031762 Bucharest, Romania

Represented by

Simona Bărcus

Prior art cited (4)

Registered RCD

RCD No 001827809-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2011-03-16

Registered RCD

RCD No 001812173-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2011-02-07

Trade mark

TALKING TOM

EUTM No 10 227 536 · EUIPO · disclosed 2012-02-09

Trade mark

TALKING TOM figurative mark

EUTM No 10 503 662 · EUIPO · disclosed 2012-05-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, infringement of earlier design rights, infringement of earlier EUTM rights, and infringement of copyright works.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and left the applicant's earlier-rights case undefended.
  • The Division assessed Article 25(1)(e) CDR and found the contested packaging design used the applicant's earlier TALKING TOM figurative EUTM for identical goods with a likelihood of confusion.
  • The application succeeded on Article 25(1)(e) alone, so the Division declared the RCD invalid and did not examine the remaining grounds further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGaile SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000119598

vs Shenzhen Chengyimei Cross-border E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2023-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)11
000127975

vs Kraftling GmbH

2025-06-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)0910
000117672

vs Yunnan Xiangkeng Trading Co., Ltd.

2022-08-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)0910
0001116012021-04-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
0001116212021-04-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000109641

vs FICOSOTA FOOD EAD

2020-09-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000011142

vs COSCENTRA B.V.

2018-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000011144

vs COSCENTRA B.V.

2018-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910