DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006369104-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-09-15

000109641

Contested design: 006369104-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006369104-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Karolina, d.o.o.via PDF extraction

HR

Vukovarska cesta 209/a, Osijek 31000, Croatia

Holder · RCD owner

Ital Food EADvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

Trakiyska Str. No. 10, 9700 Shumen, Bulgaria

Represented by

Ralitsa Venelinova Dimova

Prior art cited (8)

Web disclosureExhibits 1-3⚠ rejected as evidence

website extracts showing wafer packaging products with user comments

www.cumparaturionline.com · cumparaturionline.com

Web disclosureExhibit 4⚠ rejected as evidence

search results allegedly showing prior wafer packaging design

Google search results for "my motto wafer" · Google

Web disclosureExhibit 5⚠ rejected as evidence

blog article "My Motto Bulgarian Cookies"

My world of snacks blog · disclosed 2014-05-23

Web disclosureExhibit 6⚠ rejected as evidence

screen captures allegedly from YouTube showing wafer packaging

YouTube screen captures · YouTube

Web disclosureExhibit 7⚠ rejected as evidence

social media extracts showing several product views

Facebook extracts · Facebook

Web disclosureExhibit 8⚠ rejected as evidence

internet extract showing a brown wafer packaging view

Minimeinsights extract · Minimeinsights

PublicationExhibits 9-11

commercial leaflets from 2017 showing various wafer snack designs

commercial publications · disclosed 2017-01-01

Trade mark

earlier Croatian word mark MOTO

Croatian word mark No Z20031164 · Croatian State Intellectual Property Office

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6Article 7Article 25(1)(e)

Argument summary

  • Applicant claimed the packaging design lacked novelty and individual character over several earlier online and publication disclosures and also conflicted with its earlier Croatian word mark MOTO.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division found the alleged prior design disclosures insufficiently reliable or identifiable under Article 7, so the Article 25(1)(b) challenge failed.
  • The Division held that the contested packaging used a highly similar version of the earlier MOTO mark for similar goods, creating a likelihood of confusion in Croatia.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(e), the RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
0001116012021-04-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
0001116212021-04-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000011143

vs COSCENTRA B.V.

2018-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000011144

vs COSCENTRA B.V.

2018-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000011142

vs COSCENTRA B.V.

2018-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000010930

vs SC VIKING INTERNATIONAL SRL

2018-08-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000109102

vs MBG Holding GmbH

2020-12-11Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)099
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098