DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004171817-0072

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-18

000011143

Contested design: 004171817-0072

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004171817-0072 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Antonio Puig SA

Spain (ES)

Plaza Europa 46-48, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat 08902, Spain

Represented by

Cabinet Plasseraud

Holder · RCD owner

Coscentra B.V.via PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Wenckebachstraat 12, 6466 NC Kerkrade, Netherlands

Prior art cited (4)

International designD1

earlier registered design

DM/024 377-1 · International Designs Bulletin · disclosed 1993-01-29

National designD2

earlier registered design

M 55 597 · Swedish Patent and Registration Office design database · disclosed 1994-05-11

Web disclosureD3

‘LA CREATION Street looks’ perfume bottle

Amazon.fr ASIN B00SC5WHBK · Amazon.fr · disclosed 2015-10-01

Trade mark

three-dimensional trade mark

French trade mark registration No 92 440 690 · French trade marks bulletin · disclosed 1993-04-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over D1 to D3 and for conflict with an earlier French three-dimensional trade mark.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application or the evidence submitted.
  • The Division found the Amazon.fr listing proved public disclosure of D3 before the filing date and outside the Article 7(2) grace period.
  • It considered the contested bottle design identical to D3 in all essential features, so the RCD lacked novelty and had to be invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
0001116212021-04-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
0001116012021-04-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000109641

vs FICOSOTA FOOD EAD

2020-09-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000011142

vs COSCENTRA B.V.

2018-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000011144

vs COSCENTRA B.V.

2018-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000010930

vs SC VIKING INTERNATIONAL SRL

2018-08-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000109102

vs MBG Holding GmbH

2020-12-11Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)099
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098