DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006267985-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-20

000111621

Contested design: 006267985-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0062679850001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Société Jas Hennessy & Co.via PDF extraction

France (FR)

Rue de la Richonne, 16100 Cognac, France

Represented by

OSMOSE Avocats

Alexandra Le Corroncq

Holder · RCD owner

Liyan Liuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.014, Floor 1, Building A, Kangying Business Plaza, No. 2, Erheng Street, Banzhang Lake, Huicheng District, Huizhou City, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

National design

carafe

French design No 012408-001 · French Bulletin · disclosed 2001-07-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier French design No 012408 and also invoked an earlier French trade mark right.
  • Holder argued the bottle's wave-like indentations, prismatic indentation, cap shape, and opaque material created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier French design through its bulletin publication and assessed individual character under Article 6 CDR.
  • It found the shared bottle shape, curvature, and full-length vertical handles dominated the overall impression, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
0001116012021-04-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000109641

vs FICOSOTA FOOD EAD

2020-09-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000011143

vs COSCENTRA B.V.

2018-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000011144

vs COSCENTRA B.V.

2018-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000011142

vs COSCENTRA B.V.

2018-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000010930

vs SC VIKING INTERNATIONAL SRL

2018-08-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000109102

vs MBG Holding GmbH

2020-12-11Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)099
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098