DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003826130-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-11-13

000010759

Contested design: 003826130-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; the registered Community design No. 0038261300001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. Il disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0038261300001 è dichiarato nullo. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla richiedente, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Global Mikavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Sportowa 13, 63-004 Tulce, Polonia

Represented by

Jerzy Luczak

Holder · RCD owner

Giordano Poultry Plast S.p.A.

Italy (IT)

Via Bernezzo 47, 11023 Caraglio (Cuneo), Italia

Prior art cited (1)

National designD1

egg container

French design No. 71289-0001 · French design bulletin · disclosed 1963-02-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on earlier French design D1 for egg containers.
  • The holder argued the contested egg tray differed in the size and shape of its cells and projections and therefore remained new and individually distinctive.
  • The Division found D1 had been validly disclosed before the filing date and held that the contested design was not identical to D1, so the novelty ground failed.
  • The Division concluded the shared square tray structure with rows of egg cells created the same overall impression on the informed user, so the design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJessica LEWIS
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJose Antonio GARRIDO OTAOLA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098