DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002634196-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-11-28

000010687

Contested design: 002634196-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002634196-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

EMKAN-PRO Krzysztof Murawski

Poland (PL)

Pstrągi Gniewoty 6, 18-300 Zambrów, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

JFC Polska Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Karpin 1 A, 05-252 Dąbrówka, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

waste tank / septic tank ('SEPTITANK')

www.jfcpolska.pl (Wayback Machine) · Wayback Machine archive of www.jfcpolska.pl, supported by newspaper Wiadomości Lisiewskie and invoices/product documents · disclosed 2010-07-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested waste-tank design lacked novelty and individual character because the same tank had been publicly disclosed before filing on the holder's website, in a local newspaper, and through product-sales evidence.
  • The holder replied that the evidence was unsubstantiated because the images were blurred, key views were missing, and the test report was an internal non-public document.
  • The Division held that the Wayback Machine captures, read together with the additional evidence, proved prior disclosure of the earlier tank design before the RCD filing date.
  • It found the designs not identical because some undisclosed views differed, but those differences did not change the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238